Friday, May 31, 2019
Evolution in the United States Education System Essay -- Essays Papers
Evolution in the United States Education SystemIn July of 1925, a Tennessee high school teacher named John Scopes sat in a court room facing a violation of state law by teaching evolution, the idea that human beings and monkeys share a  confusable ancestry.  This was no ordinary trial, this was the trial of the century it featured heavy media attention, it was a battle between two of the best attorneys in the nation, and it raised many questions  more or less evolution and creation, the theory that human beings were put on Earth by God.  Today, these questions still are not answered, with cases and debates still popping up 78  age after the famous monkey trial, with the same issues at hand creation versus evolution (Futuyma 6).The evolution theory goes back to the times of the Greeks, who believed that humans went through a form of evolution.  Later on in the 18th and 19th centuries, many scientists and philosophers from Europe wrote theories pertaining to evolution.  Finally, in 185   9 On the Origins of Species, a book on observations by Englishman Charles Darwin, was  print explaining his theory, that in the long run, the fittest of all species survive, passing on different characteristics to help the next generation survive.  This theory changed the aspects of biology and sparked much controversy in society.   root in the 1870s in the United States, about ten years after Darwin released his controversial book, Southern Christians began to fight the idea of evolution, while in the North, much was not made of the topic.  It was almost completely ignored.  In the early 1900s, teaching of evolution had become pretty normal in an American elementary, middle, or high school, although sometimes with some controversy.  In the...  ...d J. (1998). Summer for the Gods The Scopes Trial and Americas Continuing Debate Over Science and Religion. Boston Harvard University Press.Levenson, J.C. (2004). The age of Darwin. Raritan, 23 (3). 115-149.Linder, Douglas. (2002). Tenness   ee vs. John Scopes Monkey Trial. Retrieved April 19, 2004, from http//www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/scopes/scopes.htmMorgan, Jeffrey P. (2003)  indicant race into the Scopes trial. Journal of American History, 90 (3). 891.Robinson, B.A.  Teaching of Evolution of U.S. schools.  Retrieved March 30, 2004, from http//religioustolerance.org/ev_school.htmShultz, Lynne H.  Summary of Evolution in Public Schools. Retrieved April 19, 2004, from http//infidels.org/activist/state/evolution.shtmlScopes, John T. & Presley, James. (1967).  midsection of the Storm.  New York Holt, Rinehart, & Winston Books                  
Thursday, May 30, 2019
criminal factors Essays -- essays research papers
 What makes criminals? Have you ever wondered why some  mixer groups  ar  to a greater extent than  addicted to  aversion than others  be? Should we conclude that some groups  be more prone to  nuisance or that they are just put in a  side that makes them more likely to commit crimes? In spite of the research in the past years there is still no conclusive evidence as to why some people in the same situations choose to commit crimes while the others dont. There are numerous reasons that offenders resort to crime Families, gender,  sparing status, age, and  black market are  alone valid explanations said by m both theorists as to why certain  affectionate groups commit crimes, and why certain groups  preventative away. get married life is the norm of our society but it can  alike cause strain and anguish. Along with the anointing of a  radical life, there also comes new problems. Often times the choice of getting married is the first major decision in a young man or  womans life, and s   oon there are more relatives, more bills, conflicting plans, annoying habits that ones spouse may develop,  youngsterren, being that fifty  per centum of all marriages end in divorce, these are things that most couples can non overcome, society is to the point where for every marriage there is a coinciding divorce. When these new hurdles are not overcome then a broken home is the most common result. When this happens, then the likelihood of a person being driven to crime skyrockets.  adept starts to think that they are worthless and that they are destined to be lonely forever, once this occurs, crime is their next option. A broken family can  take back in different ways, divorce, death, or separation. Marriage is a common but not the most likely reason that some resort to crime. Someone who  usually commits a crime at a young age is often identified as a born criminal, these reckless actions for a helpless and  poverty-stricken child are passed down as a result of hereditary traits    that pass from one generation to the next. It is said that these offending children do not  be every better because of their traits, and the enviro custodyt that they are brought up in (Erikson 1964). These children specialize in crime and delinquency just as others may specialize in the  schoolroom or sports. They arent able to tell the difference between a deviant act or something productive such as an A in the classroom. When we  do someone or some group as deviant - we strengthen ...  ... On average, inmates are younger than the general population. It is apparent that some social groups are in situations more conducive to crime, because of the environment they live in. Boys and men dominate in crime. Arrest, self report and victimization data all reflects that boys and men  bring to pass more conventional and serious crimes than girls and women. It appears that boys and men no longer are "normal subjects" of violence and that as equal rights and feminist groups become st   ronger and more  mysterious so to do women in crime. In terms of race and crime, crime will continue among minorities until an equilibrium in social class and  business organisation  be is met. The question of economics as a cause of crime finds that people are not forced into crime because they are poor, but because they are not capable of getting the luxuries that they have deemed necessities. They have gone from being in a comfortable, employed  recite to an unemployed and very difficult state and no longer can live beyond their means. In conclusion, law offenders feel that by becoming criminally active they can elaborate themselves of any social or psychological problem they may have.                 criminal factors Essays --  essays research papers What makes criminals? Have you ever wondered why some social groups are more prone to crime than others are? Should we conclude that some groups are more prone to crime or that they are just put in a situation that makes them more l   ikely to commit crimes? In spite of the research in the past years there is still no conclusive evidence as to why some people in the same situations choose to commit crimes while the others dont. There are numerous reasons that offenders resort to crime Families, gender, economic status, age, and race are all valid explanations said by many theorists as to why certain social groups commit crimes, and why certain groups stay away.Married life is the norm of our society but it can also cause strain and anguish. Along with the anointing of a new life, there also comes new problems. Often times the choice of getting married is the first major decision in a young man or womans life, and soon there are more relatives, more bills, conflicting plans, annoying habits that ones spouse may develop, children, being that fifty percent of all marriages end in divorce, these are things that most couples cannot overcome, society is to the point where for every marriage there is a coinciding divorc   e. When these new hurdles are not overcome then a broken home is the most common result. When this happens, then the likelihood of a person being driven to crime skyrockets. One starts to think that they are worthless and that they are destined to be lonely forever, once this occurs, crime is their next option. A broken family can generate in different ways, divorce, death, or separation. Marriage is a common but not the most likely reason that some resort to crime. Someone who usually commits a crime at a young age is often identified as a born criminal, these reckless actions for a helpless and innocent child are passed down as a result of hereditary traits that pass from one generation to the next. It is said that these offending children do not know any better because of their traits, and the enviroment that they are brought up in (Erikson 1964). These children specialize in crime and delinquency just as others may specialize in the classroom or sports. They arent able to tell t   he difference between a deviant act or something productive such as an A in the classroom. When we define someone or some group as deviant - we strengthen ...  ... On average, inmates are younger than the general population. It is apparent that some social groups are in situations more conducive to crime, because of the environment they live in. Boys and men dominate in crime. Arrest, self report and victimization data all reflects that boys and men perpetrate more conventional and serious crimes than girls and women. It appears that boys and men no longer are "normal subjects" of violence and that as equal rights and feminist groups become stronger and more profound so to do women in crime. In terms of race and crime, crime will continue among minorities until an equilibrium in social class and job ranking is met. The question of economics as a cause of crime finds that people are not forced into crime because they are poor, but because they are not capable of getting the l   uxuries that they have deemed necessities. They have gone from being in a comfortable, employed state to an unemployed and very difficult state and no longer can live beyond their means. In conclusion, law offenders feel that by becoming criminally active they can elaborate themselves of any social or psychological problem they may have.                   
Wednesday, May 29, 2019
Drug Abuse Among Professional Athletes Essay examples -- Substance Abu
 Drug  profane among professional basketball  thespians is a problem as old as time. In some circumstances it may not be the athletes fault. For example when they are treating a minor cough or a cold, the medications used  entrust some clock contain small amounts of alcohol. On the other hand some athletes purposely abuse drugs for a variety of reasons. Some  go about to cover up the presence of other drug abuse but most abuse drugs because they will enhance their performance. The most common abused drugs in professional basketball are anabolic steroids,  marijuana, and amphetamines. Each drug has its own effect on performance, and disciplinary actions. When an athlete uses anabolic steroids, they usually feel that they will give them a competitive advantage over their opponents. If you think that only football players, weightlifters, and sprinters take steroids your wrong. Steroids are designed to mimic the bodybuilding traits of testosterone. The exact  do of anabolic on the athlet   e and athletic performance remain controversial but some test results have shown that steroids affect the professional basketball players performance in different ways. Steroids are said to make the athlete feel more energized, more aggressive, and able to train harder. When athletes choose to abuse anabolic steroids it also results in disciplinary actions if they are tested positive by the league. Three types of testing in professional basketball are  credible cause, first-year, and veteran testing. If any player tests positive for the first time during any of the three tests, they will be suspended for five games. A second  offensive activity for anabolic steroid abuse will result in a ten-game suspension and a third offense will result in a twenty-five game suspension. The National Basketball Association will release any player if they are convicted of, or plead guilty to a  law-breaking involving the use or possession of steroids. Marijuana is the most widely used of the illicit    drugs in the National Basketball Association. Marijuana has many negative affects to  apply it it impairs skills requiring eye-hand coordination and fast reaction time. It also reduces motor coordination, tracking ability, and perceptual accuracy. When using marijuana you may have side affects such as difficulty concentrating and times where you are in dreamlike situ...  ...Arrested for marijuana possession at airport in Canada.1997Mookie BlaylockNBA BasketballArrested for possession of marijuana while already on probation for marijuana and drunk driving convictions.1996Isaiah RiderNBA BasketballArrested for marijuana possession.1996Juwan HowardNBA BasketballArrested for driving under the influence.1995Vernon MaxwellNBA BasketballCharged with marijuana possession. Convicted in 1998, spent 45 days in jail.-http//www.drugs.indiana.edu/prevention/ideas/drugged_athletes.html                  
Addressing Crime in America in John J. DiIulios Article, Let em Rot E
Addressing Crime in America in John J. DiIulios Article, Let em RotJohn J. DiIulio, Jr. writes his article, Let em Rot, in response to the  enounce of the Union Address by President Clinton in January of 1994. In this article he focuses on the continually increasing crime problem in America. DiIulio feels that a change is needed in the way this country handles the punishment and rehabilitation of criminals. He makes a claim of policy that criminals should serve their entire prison sentences. DiIulio asserts, a prison sentence of X years should mean a prison sentence of X years (truth in sentencing) (563). He directs his article towards people who  atomic number 18 concerned with the crime problem in America, specifically victims of crime and the families of criminals. He also primarily targets people who read the Wall Street Journal and  bear out truth-in-sentencing.Throughout the article, DiIulios support is primarily based on motivational appeal. He quickly draws interest into the    article through the shocking choice of words for his title. He then goes on to provoke readers with the...                  
Tuesday, May 28, 2019
Comparing Sin in Fire From Heaven, Much Ado About Nothing, and The Flea :: comparison compare contrast essays
  Sin in Fire From Heaven, Much Ado  roughly Nothing, and The Flea         In Fire from Heaven, Much Ado  closely Nothing,  and The Flea, the authors take a stance on men and women committing  disgustful acts  and using  it as a  master(prenominal) position in their work.  They write from a  truly religious perspective which is probably due to the time period in which their work was written.  They develop this  musical theme in very different perspectives to get their  taper across.  They express this position vividly  throughout their work.         David Underdown didnt live in this time  period, but his work was a work of history and his ideas coincided with those of the Puritans.   He uses these ideas to take a position on the Puritans side and to better explain the good they were trying to achieve.  The Puritans of  Dorchester as we have  knowledgeable about  our reading, were a very religious  convention     who wanted to create the perfect society.  Their mission in Dorchester was  to make extinct all the sinful acts of the townspeople. The  push they started soon ended in failure. They were a  decisive influence upon his  work.  His views of sexual misconduct between marital men and women being  worse than that between  divorced people probably come from his growing up in a more modern world.  The Puritans probably did distinguish some, but  it wasnt very  crowing or apparent.  His makes this point clear in  the passage, Misbehavior among married people was especially serious, as it was likely to disrupt existing families, which were of course regarded as the essential foundations of  either ordered, virtuous society(p.66).   The Puritan influence is very prominent in excerpt from the previous quote, families,... the essential foundations of any ordered, virtuous society(p.66).  Underdown also makes a reference to the  opposites towns  in the area and how the    Puritan presence made a difference, It is unlikely that Dorchester people were any more, or any less, loose in their sexual habits than their neighbors in other place.  But stories of their  misdeeds even in the years of the  puritan ascendancy are abundant(p.66).  With  this passage the author shows how the presence of the Puritans changed the  total view of the town and its people.         Underdown used the sinful acts between men and  women to draw out  analyze Sin in Fire From Heaven, Much Ado About Nothing, and The Flea    comparison compare contrast essays  Sin in Fire From Heaven, Much Ado About Nothing, and The Flea         In Fire from Heaven, Much Ado About Nothing,  and The Flea, the authors take a stance on men and women committing sinful acts  and using  it as a main position in their work.  They write from a very religious perspective which is probably due to the time period in which their work was writt   en.  They develop this idea in very different perspectives to get their point across.  They express this position vividly  throughout their work.         David Underdown didnt live in this time  period, but his work was a work of history and his ideas coincided with those of the Puritans.   He uses these ideas to take a position on the Puritans side and to better explain the good they were trying to achieve.  The Puritans of  Dorchester as we have learned about  our reading, were a very religious group  who wanted to create the perfect society.  Their mission in Dorchester was  to make extinct all the sinful acts of the townspeople. The struggle they started soon ended in failure. They were a definite influence upon his  work.  His views of sexual misconduct between married men and women being  worse than that between unmarried people probably come from his growing up in a more modern world.  The Puritans probably did distingui   sh some, but  it wasnt very prominent or apparent.  His makes this point clear in  the passage, Misbehavior among married people was especially serious, as it was likely to disrupt existing families, which were of course regarded as the essential foundations of any ordered, virtuous society(p.66).   The Puritan influence is very prominent in excerpt from the previous quote, families,... the essential foundations of any ordered, virtuous society(p.66).  Underdown also makes a reference to the others towns  in the area and how the Puritan presence made a difference, It is unlikely that Dorchester people were any more, or any less, loose in their sexual habits than their neighbors in other place.  But stories of their  misdeeds even in the years of the puritan ascendancy are abundant(p.66).  With  this passage the author shows how the presence of the Puritans changed the  total view of the town and its people.         Underdown used the sinfu   l acts between men and  women to draw out   
Comparing Sin in Fire From Heaven, Much Ado About Nothing, and The Flea :: comparison compare contrast essays
  Sin in Fire From Heaven,  in truth much Ado About Nothing, and The Flea         In Fire from Heaven,  oft Ado About Nothing,  and The Flea, the authors take a stance on men and women committing sinful acts  and using  it as a main position in their  take a crap.  They  frame from a in truth religious perspective which is probably due to the time period in which their work was written.  They develop this idea in very  polar perspectives to get their point across.  They express this position vividly  throughout their work.         David Underdown didnt live in this time  period,  unless his work was a work of history and his ideas coincided with those of the Puritans.   He uses these ideas to take a position on the Puritans side and to better explain the good they were trying to achieve.  The Puritans of  Dorchester as we have learned about  our reading, were a very religious group  who wanted to create the p   erfect society.  Their mission in Dorchester was  to make extinct  any the sinful acts of the  townshipspeople. The struggle they started soon ended in failure. They were a definite  influence upon his  work.  His views of  inner misconduct between married men and women being  worsened than that between unmarried people probably  go on from his growing up in a more modern world.  The Puritans probably did distinguish some, but  it wasnt very prominent or apparent.  His makes this point clear in  the passage, Misbehavior among married people was especially serious, as it was likely to disrupt existing families, which were of course regarded as the essential foundations of any ordered, virtuous society(p.66).   The Puritan influence is very prominent in excerpt from the previous quote, families,... the essential foundations of any ordered, virtuous society(p.66).  Underdown also makes a reference to the others towns  in the area and how the Puritan bearing made    a difference, It is unlikely that Dorchester people were any more, or any less, loose in their sexual habits than their neighbors in other place.  But stories of their  misdeeds even in the years of the puritan ascendancy are abundant(p.66).  With  this passage the author shows how the presence of the Puritans changed the  total view of the town and its people.         Underdown used the sinful acts between men and  women to  repulsion out Comparing Sin in Fire From Heaven, Much Ado About Nothing, and The Flea    comparison compare contrast essays  Sin in Fire From Heaven, Much Ado About Nothing, and The Flea         In Fire from Heaven, Much Ado About Nothing,  and The Flea, the authors take a stance on men and women committing sinful acts  and using  it as a main position in their work.  They write from a very religious perspective which is probably due to the time period in which their work was written.  They de   velop this idea in very different perspectives to get their point across.  They express this position vividly  throughout their work.         David Underdown didnt live in this time  period, but his work was a work of history and his ideas coincided with those of the Puritans.   He uses these ideas to take a position on the Puritans side and to better explain the good they were trying to achieve.  The Puritans of  Dorchester as we have learned about  our reading, were a very religious group  who wanted to create the perfect society.  Their mission in Dorchester was  to make extinct all the sinful acts of the townspeople. The struggle they started soon ended in failure. They were a definite influence upon his  work.  His views of sexual misconduct between married men and women being  worse than that between unmarried people probably come from his growing up in a more modern world.  The Puritans probably did distinguish some, but  it    wasnt very prominent or apparent.  His makes this point clear in  the passage, Misbehavior among married people was especially serious, as it was likely to disrupt existing families, which were of course regarded as the essential foundations of any ordered, virtuous society(p.66).   The Puritan influence is very prominent in excerpt from the previous quote, families,... the essential foundations of any ordered, virtuous society(p.66).  Underdown also makes a reference to the others towns  in the area and how the Puritan presence made a difference, It is unlikely that Dorchester people were any more, or any less, loose in their sexual habits than their neighbors in other place.  But stories of their  misdeeds even in the years of the puritan ascendancy are abundant(p.66).  With  this passage the author shows how the presence of the Puritans changed the  total view of the town and its people.         Underdown used the sinful acts between m   en and  women to draw out   
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
 
